10 Highlights Non-Financial Institutions Need to Know About Money Laundering in Nigeria

Money laundering is the act of concealing the true origin and purpose of illegally acquired money. It is punishable in Nigeria with a jail term of between 7 and 14 years.

For purposes of Nigeria’s anti-money laundering laws (“AML”), a non-financial institution (“NFI”), is any of:

dealers in jewelleries, cars, luxury goods, precious metals and stones, real estates, and mechanized farming equipment and machineries;
professionals such as chartered accountants, audit firms, tax consultants, legal practitioners;
organisations such as hotels, casinos, supermarkets, clearing and settlement companies;
Non-governmental and or not-for-profit organisations;
such other businesses as the Federal Ministry Industry, Trade and Investments (the “Ministry”) or appropriate regulatory authorities may from time to time designate

A NFI has an obligation to verify all its customers’ identities and update their relevant information. It also has an obligation to ensure that all transactions carried on by the customer is consistent with its business and risk profile.

All transfers to or from a foreign country which exceeds US$10,000 (“reportable foreign transfers” or “RFT”) or its equivalent are to be reported to any of the Central Bank of Nigeria, the Securities and Exchange Commission of Nigeria, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (“EFCC”) or the Special Control Unit on Money Laundering (“SCUML”). SCUML is an office within the Ministry. Failure to report an RFT attracts, for an individual, imprisonment for at least 3 years or a fine of N10million or both. The fine for corporates is N25million.

Cash-based transactions for individuals is limited to N5million in Nigeria; in other words, an individual cannot collect or pay more than N5million in cash at any time. The limit for corporate organisations is N10million. Collection of cash which exceeds these thresholds attracts, for an individual, imprisonment for at least 3 years or a fine of N10million or both. The fine for corporates is also N25million.

Every single transaction, lodgement or funds transfer above N5million in the case of an individual or N10million in the case of a corporate body must be reported in writing by NFIs to the EFCC within 30 days of the transaction. Failure to so do attracts a fine of between N250,000 and N1million for each day of default.

NFIs have an obligation to enquire from their customers and at the same time report all suspicious transactions in writing to the EFCC. The unjustifiableness and unreasonableness of transactions are sufficient to qualify them as suspicious. Failure to comply with this obligation attracts a fine of N1million for each day of default.

NFIs are required to preserve both the records of their customer’s identification and that of reported transactions, for a minimum period of 5 years.

Officers of the Ministry, the EFCC and the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (“NDLEA”) are empowered to demand, obtain and inspect the books and records of any NFI to confirm its compliance with the foregoing.

All criminal cases relating to money laundering, including all the offences or failures mentioned above, are to be instituted at the Federal High Court. The cases are to be heard expeditiously as the Court is statutorily mandated, subject to the 1999 Constitution, not to entertain any application for stay of proceedings until judgment is delivered.

For further information on the foregoing, please contact us by email: ao2alert@ao2law.com with the subject: “The National Action Plan on Ease of Doing Business”

More Articles

DIGITAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION: NAVIGATING LEGAL CHALLENGES IN ONLINE TRANSACTIONS

The development of Internet and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has revolutionised the world and brought with them the emergence of online commerce. Trades are now concluded on the Internet between parties from different parts of the world. Online transactions have reshaped the foundations of trade and have brought many advantages to many individuals and corporate entities. More goods and services are being bought and sold online on a daily basis. In fact, some goods and services are bought and sold virtually online without any physical or tangible equivalent. Interestingly, Nigerian Courts are increasingly adopting digital tools, especially in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic to resolve commercial disputes. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures such as arbitration and mediation are also being digitized.

Aligning ESG Practices in the Nigerian Oil and Gas Sector with Climate Change and Nigeria’s Net-Zero Goal by 2060

Nigeria’s oil and gas sector evolved over the decades. The sector has moved from an era where little or no effort was put towards addressing the negative impacts occasioned by oil exploration and other incendiary activities, the failure by the Federal Government (FG) to sign the Petroleum Industry Bill into Law and a plethora of socially related malaise that have affected the host communities; their source of livelihood and their living conditions to one where a robust Legislative framework coupled with Regulations have been put in place to make it align with global best practices.

HIGHLIGHTS OF AO2LAW’S WEBINAR: “PENSION FUND ADMINISTRATORS AND PENSION FUND CUSTODIANS: RETHINKING THE STRICTURES ON COMMON CONTROL.”

On the 17th of April 2024, the firm of Anaje. Olumide. Oke. Akinkugbe (carrying on business as AO2LAW®) held a stakeholders’ webinar with the theme: “Pension Fund Administrators and Pension Fund Custodians: Rethinking the Strictures on Common Control”. The webinar commenced with a keynote address delivered by Mr. Chinedu Anaje, FCIArb, a Partner at AO2LAW. In his address, Mr. Anaje highlighted the roles of the key players within the Nigerian pension industry and reiterated the need for continuous stakeholder engagement to ensure the growth and development of the pension industry in Nigeria. He equally expressed the view that while the extant law on pensions in Nigeria, the Pension Reform Act of 2014 (the “Act”) had been largely successful in actualising its objectives, it was imperative for the stakeholders within the sector to mull over a possible fine-tuning of certain provisions of the Act to ensure alignment with economic realities and international best practices in the administration of pensions.