INTRODUCTION
The 5th Schedule to the FIRS
Establishment Act 2007 (FIRSEA) established the Tax Appeal Tribunal (TAT)
to preside over disputes between an aggrieved taxpayer and tax authorities in
Nigeria, giving it the right to exercise jurisdiction, powers and authority on
issues of taxation.[1] These tax authorities include
the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and any other body responsible
for the assessment and collection of taxes.[2]
The TAT is empowered to adjudicate on disputes
and controversies arising from tax laws including the Companies Income Tax Act
(CITA), Personal Income Tax Act (PITA), Petroleum Profits Tax Act, Capital
Gains Tax Act and any other law contained in or specified in the First Schedule
to the FIRSEA or other laws made or to be made from time to time by the
National Assembly.[3]
The FIRSEA further grants the Minister of
Finance the power to make rules prescribing the procedure to be followed in the
conduct of appeals before the TAT.[4]
It is further to this power that the TAT Rules 2021 (the New Rules) was brought
into force on the 10th of June, 2021, thereby revoking the TAT Rules
(2010).[5]
With the enactment of the New Rules, a number of changes have been introduced
to the procedure before the TAT. This article highlights the new procedures
brought into force by the New Rules.
PROCEDURES INTRODUCED BY THE NEW RULES
SN
Procedure
New TAT Rules 2021
Comments
1.
Commencement of an Appeal
Order III Rule 4
provides for the format by which an appeal may be filed at the TAT,
specifically referencing Form TAT1A which is contained in the First Schedule
to the New Rules.
Order III Rule 6 (b)
further provides for the filing of the Notice of Appeal along with a
deposition as in Form TAT 1B.
TAT1 A as provided
in the First Schedule to the New Rules prescribes the form in which a Notice
of Appeal is to be presented.
The Form TAT 1B is a
deposition as to the payment of security by an Appellant for pursuing the
appeal.
2
Electronic Filing of an appeal
Order III Rule 5
provides that a notice or process capable of being filed at the TAT may be
filed by such electronic means as may be directed by the TAT.
The introduction of
an e-filing system is of a great advantage to parties and the entire legal
system as a whole. This will do away with unnecessary costs such as
transportation to the TAT, volume of paperwork as well as saving time.
3.
Payment of Security Deposit as
condition for pursuing an Appeal
Order III Rule
6 provides that for an Appeal against
the FIRS or relevant tax authority, the aggrieved person shall pay 50% of
disputed amount into designated account by the TAT before hearing as security
for prosecuting the appeal.
The provision of the
New Rules in this regard seems restrictive. Under the TAT Rules 2010 (the Old
Rules), an aggrieved party was allowed access to the TAT without having to
pay a security deposit.[6]
The only requirement for an aggrieved party is to file his appeal within 30
days from the date of the action complained of. This is further supported by
the FIRSEA.[7]
The provisions of
the New Rules will restrict an aggrieved person’s access to the TAT –
particularly where he cannot afford to pay the 50% security deposit.
Further, we note
that where a subsidiary legislation is inconsistent with an Act, the
provisions of such subsidiary legislation shall be void to the extent of such
inconsistency.
4.
Place of instituting Appeals
Order IV Rule 2
provides that a Notice of Appeal may be filed at the secretariat of any zone
but shall be headed in the name of the appropriate zone where such matter
will be heard.
This is a welcome
provision as it serves to assist an aggrieved person who is not within the
jurisdiction of the appropriate TAT to still file his appeal, which will be
transmitted to the appropriate TAT for hearing.
5.
Electronic Service
Order VII Rule 3
provides that a notice shall be deemed to have been properly served if sent
by email or such other electronic means as the TAT may direct or permit.
The electronic
service is once again a welcome provision. This is particularly in light of
the COVID19 pandemic as well as cost of service. This will also do away with
difficulty in serving processes on a party.
6.
Default of Appearance
Order IX Rule 2
provides that when an appeal has been struck out owing to the non-appearance
of the Appellant, the TAT may, upon application by the Appellant, direct the
appeal to be re-listed for hearing, if the TAT considers that such
application for relisting of the appeal has merit.
The provision of the
New Rules in this regard is different from the old rules in that the Old
Rules subjected the relisting of an appeal to the discretion of the TAT. It
presupposes that under the Old Rules, an Appellant did not necessarily need
to apply for relisting an Appeal.
7.
Virtual Hearing
Order XI Rule 4
provides that the hearing of applications and delivery of rulings may be held
remotely, via virtual means, using such communication technology or
application as may be directed by the TAT to ensure fair hearing.
We assume that this
is a typical response to the recent realities, particularly in light of the
COVID19 pandemic. This will save time, allow parties who are not physically
present to still participate in the hearing process.
We also note that
there are disadvantages to this such as technology savviness of parties as
well as internet disruptions.
8.
Applications in Chambers
Order XI Rule 5
provides that the TAT may take ex-parte and non-contentious applications in
Chambers and may adjourn such proceedings from Chambers to TAT or vice versa.
This will also
assist the TAT in making quick decisions.
9.
Documents-only Procedure
Order XV provides
for a document only procedure, stating that at any time before the
commencement of trial, the Parties may apply for a Documents-Only Procedure
through Form TAT 6 and in doing so agree for the appeal to be decided by such
procedure.
This is a welcome
procedure as it will dispense with parties having to present their cases
orally to the TAT. A Documents-Only procedure will limit the time spent in
court and fast-track the TAT’s decision making.
10.
Summary Appeal Procedure
Order XVI provides
for a Summary Appeal Procedure. Requires filing a Notice of Appeal and an affidavit
stating that there is no defence.
A Summary Appeal
Procedure (same as a Summary Judgment procedure, where a Respondent/Defendant
has no defence) will serve to reduce the time spent in the TAT.
11.
Pre-trial Conference
Order XVII Rule 2
provides that the TAT shall have the powers to conduct a pre-trial conference
for the purpose of narrowing down the issues before trial and facilitate
settlement.
A pre-trial
conference which is seen in typical court settings has now also been adopted
by the TAT. This will assist the TAT as well as the Parties in narrowing down
issues in dispute and consequently saving time.
12.
Dates
Order XVIII provides
that the Secretary upon direction of the Chairman shall fix hearing dates for
appeals and issue hearing notices as in Form TAT 11 of the First Schedule to
the Rules
The Old Rules
prescribed Notices in Form TAT 8, but this has been replaced by the New Rules
which prescribes that same be done in Form TAT 11
13.
Time Limit for determination of an
Appeal by the TAT
Order XXI Rule 1
provides that appeals before the TAT shall be heard, concluded and decision
given within a period not exceeding six months from the date of commencement
of trial or within such a time as the TAT may determine.
The New Rules have
prescribed that an appeal shall be concluded within 6months from the date
trial was commenced. This will save time as well as reduce the backlog of
cases that have been pending at the TAT.
14.
Review of TAT’s Decisions
Order XXI Rule 6 provides that the
TAT may suo moto (on its own) or on the application of a
party review and correct, rescind or vary its decisions if it is satisfied
that-
a)
The decision contains an ambiguity, patent error or omission but only
to the extent of such ambiguity, error, or omission;
b)
The decision of the TAT was obtained by fraud.
This provision goes
further to state that parties to such decision shall have the opportunity to
be heard by the TAT
Order XXI Rule 7 provides that an
application for a review of the TAT’s decision shall be brought within 14
days from the date it was delivered.
This will save time
and effort which would have ordinarily been used in an Appeal to the Federal
High Court. Where the conditions for a review have been proved by a Party,
such decision given by the TAT will be subject to a review.
15.
Settlement
Order XXI Rule 9
provides that where Parties have indicated their desire to explore settlement
of their dispute, the TAT may adjourn the matter to enable the parties
explore such settlement. Parties are also required to report progress on the
settlement at such date as directed by the TAT.[8]
The Rules further
provide that upon parties reaching terms of settlement, both parties shall
sign same and file with the TAT, which shall adopt the terms of settlement as
its decision by consent of the parties.[9]
The New Rules also
give parties an opportunity for settlement. Where parties have settled
outside the TAT, the TAT shall adopt the terms of settlement as its decision
in the matter.
16.
Costs
Order XXII provides
that parties shall bear their own cost except where costs are incurred
improperly or without reasonable cause or are wasted by undue delay or by any
misconduct or default, then the TAT may award costs against any person
responsible.
This is again
another point of inconsistency between the New Rules and the FIRSEA. The Act
provides that parties shall bear their own costs.[10]
We note that where a
subsidiary legislation is inconsistent with an Act, the provisions of such
subsidiary legislation shall be void to the extent of such inconsistency.
17.
Appeal to Federal High Court
Order XXVII Rule 1
provides that a party dissatisfied with a decision of the TAT may appeal on
point of law to the Federal High Court by filing a Notice of Appeal at the TAT
within 30 days from the date such decision was given.[11]
The Secretary of the
TAT is mandated to transmit to the Chief Registrar of the Federal High Court
within 14 days, record of proceedings and all exhibits tendered at hearing
before the TAT.[12]
We note that there
is an inconsistency between the provisions of the FIRSEA and the New Rules.
Paragraph 16 (3) of FIRSEA requires that notwithstanding an appeal at the Federal
High Court, tax shall be paid in accordance with the decision of the TAT
within one month. The New Rules are silent on this position as they do not
specify that tax should be paid before an appeal commences at the Federal
High Court.
CONCLUSION
The New Rules contain several provisions which
are a reflection of the current realities and which will aid in a speedy
dispensation of justice. The adoption of an e-filing, e-service and e-hearing
process will go along way in assisting the TAT as well as parties in speedily
resolving their disputes.
However, there are provisions which are a cause
for concern – such as the provisions of Order III Rule 6 which requires an
aggrieved tax-payer who wishes to appeal an assessment from a tax authority to
make a deposit of 50% of the amount in dispute. This condition will seriously
hamper an appellant’s access to the TAT and also engender abuse of power or
corruption on the part of tax authorities, seeing that the doors of the TAT
have been semi-shut to tax-payers.
We also note the inconsistency between the
provisions of the New Rules and the FIRSEA in this regard, and restate that as
the FIRSEA has not provided for payment of any security deposit by Appellant
(except in Paragraph 15 (7), on which certain conditions have to be fulfilled
by the FIRS before an order for such payment is made), the Rules cannot on its
own prescribe the payment of a security deposit. Accordingly, we recommend that
this provision be amended to do away with the security deposit as condition for
an appeal as same is contradictory with the Act from which it emanates and from
which power is even granted to the Minister of Finance to make the Rules.
[1] Paragraph 1
of the Fifth Schedule to the FIRSEA
[2] Section 59
of the FIRSEA
[3] Paragraph
11 of the Fifth Schedule to the FIRSEA
[4] Paragraph
21 of the Fifth Schedule to the FIRSEA
[5] Order 1
Rule 2 of the Tax Appeal Tribunal (Procedure) Rules 2021
[6] Order III
Rule 1 of the TAT Rules 2010
[7] Paragraph
13 (1) and (2) of the Fifth Schedule to the FIRS Establishment Act
[8] Order XXI
Rule 9 (2) of the TAT Rules 2021
[9] Order XXI
Rule 9 (3) of the TAT Rules 2021
[10] Paragraph
22 of the Fifth Schedule to the FIRS Establishment Act
[11] Order XXVII
Rule 1 of the TAT Rules 2021
[12] Order XXVII
Rule 2 of the TAT Rules 2021
INTRODUCTION
The 5th Schedule to the FIRS
Establishment Act 2007 (FIRSEA) established the Tax Appeal Tribunal (TAT)
to preside over disputes between an aggrieved taxpayer and tax authorities in
Nigeria, giving it the right to exercise jurisdiction, powers and authority on
issues of taxation.[1] These tax authorities include
the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and any other body responsible
for the assessment and collection of taxes.[2]
The TAT is empowered to adjudicate on disputes
and controversies arising from tax laws including the Companies Income Tax Act
(CITA), Personal Income Tax Act (PITA), Petroleum Profits Tax Act, Capital
Gains Tax Act and any other law contained in or specified in the First Schedule
to the FIRSEA or other laws made or to be made from time to time by the
National Assembly.[3]
The FIRSEA further grants the Minister of
Finance the power to make rules prescribing the procedure to be followed in the
conduct of appeals before the TAT.[4]
It is further to this power that the TAT Rules 2021 (the New Rules) was brought
into force on the 10th of June, 2021, thereby revoking the TAT Rules
(2010).[5]
With the enactment of the New Rules, a number of changes have been introduced
to the procedure before the TAT. This article highlights the new procedures
brought into force by the New Rules.
PROCEDURES INTRODUCED BY THE NEW RULES
|
SN |
Procedure |
New TAT Rules 2021 |
Comments |
|
1. |
Commencement of an Appeal |
Order III Rule 4
provides for the format by which an appeal may be filed at the TAT,
specifically referencing Form TAT1A which is contained in the First Schedule
to the New Rules.
Order III Rule 6 (b)
further provides for the filing of the Notice of Appeal along with a
deposition as in Form TAT 1B. |
TAT1 A as provided
in the First Schedule to the New Rules prescribes the form in which a Notice
of Appeal is to be presented.
The Form TAT 1B is a
deposition as to the payment of security by an Appellant for pursuing the
appeal. |
|
2 |
Electronic Filing of an appeal |
Order III Rule 5
provides that a notice or process capable of being filed at the TAT may be
filed by such electronic means as may be directed by the TAT.
|
The introduction of
an e-filing system is of a great advantage to parties and the entire legal
system as a whole. This will do away with unnecessary costs such as
transportation to the TAT, volume of paperwork as well as saving time. |
|
3. |
Payment of Security Deposit as
condition for pursuing an Appeal |
Order III Rule
6 provides that for an Appeal against
the FIRS or relevant tax authority, the aggrieved person shall pay 50% of
disputed amount into designated account by the TAT before hearing as security
for prosecuting the appeal.
|
The provision of the
New Rules in this regard seems restrictive. Under the TAT Rules 2010 (the Old
Rules), an aggrieved party was allowed access to the TAT without having to
pay a security deposit.[6]
The only requirement for an aggrieved party is to file his appeal within 30
days from the date of the action complained of. This is further supported by
the FIRSEA.[7]
The provisions of
the New Rules will restrict an aggrieved person’s access to the TAT –
particularly where he cannot afford to pay the 50% security deposit.
Further, we note
that where a subsidiary legislation is inconsistent with an Act, the
provisions of such subsidiary legislation shall be void to the extent of such
inconsistency. |
|
4. |
Place of instituting Appeals |
Order IV Rule 2
provides that a Notice of Appeal may be filed at the secretariat of any zone
but shall be headed in the name of the appropriate zone where such matter
will be heard. |
This is a welcome
provision as it serves to assist an aggrieved person who is not within the
jurisdiction of the appropriate TAT to still file his appeal, which will be
transmitted to the appropriate TAT for hearing. |
|
5. |
Electronic Service |
Order VII Rule 3
provides that a notice shall be deemed to have been properly served if sent
by email or such other electronic means as the TAT may direct or permit. |
The electronic
service is once again a welcome provision. This is particularly in light of
the COVID19 pandemic as well as cost of service. This will also do away with
difficulty in serving processes on a party. |
|
6. |
Default of Appearance |
Order IX Rule 2
provides that when an appeal has been struck out owing to the non-appearance
of the Appellant, the TAT may, upon application by the Appellant, direct the
appeal to be re-listed for hearing, if the TAT considers that such
application for relisting of the appeal has merit. |
The provision of the
New Rules in this regard is different from the old rules in that the Old
Rules subjected the relisting of an appeal to the discretion of the TAT. It
presupposes that under the Old Rules, an Appellant did not necessarily need
to apply for relisting an Appeal. |
|
7. |
Virtual Hearing |
Order XI Rule 4
provides that the hearing of applications and delivery of rulings may be held
remotely, via virtual means, using such communication technology or
application as may be directed by the TAT to ensure fair hearing. |
We assume that this
is a typical response to the recent realities, particularly in light of the
COVID19 pandemic. This will save time, allow parties who are not physically
present to still participate in the hearing process.
We also note that
there are disadvantages to this such as technology savviness of parties as
well as internet disruptions. |
|
8. |
Applications in Chambers |
Order XI Rule 5
provides that the TAT may take ex-parte and non-contentious applications in
Chambers and may adjourn such proceedings from Chambers to TAT or vice versa. |
This will also
assist the TAT in making quick decisions. |
|
9. |
Documents-only Procedure |
Order XV provides
for a document only procedure, stating that at any time before the
commencement of trial, the Parties may apply for a Documents-Only Procedure
through Form TAT 6 and in doing so agree for the appeal to be decided by such
procedure. |
This is a welcome
procedure as it will dispense with parties having to present their cases
orally to the TAT. A Documents-Only procedure will limit the time spent in
court and fast-track the TAT’s decision making. |
|
10. |
Summary Appeal Procedure |
Order XVI provides
for a Summary Appeal Procedure. Requires filing a Notice of Appeal and an affidavit
stating that there is no defence. |
A Summary Appeal
Procedure (same as a Summary Judgment procedure, where a Respondent/Defendant
has no defence) will serve to reduce the time spent in the TAT. |
|
11. |
Pre-trial Conference |
Order XVII Rule 2
provides that the TAT shall have the powers to conduct a pre-trial conference
for the purpose of narrowing down the issues before trial and facilitate
settlement. |
A pre-trial
conference which is seen in typical court settings has now also been adopted
by the TAT. This will assist the TAT as well as the Parties in narrowing down
issues in dispute and consequently saving time. |
|
12. |
Dates |
Order XVIII provides
that the Secretary upon direction of the Chairman shall fix hearing dates for
appeals and issue hearing notices as in Form TAT 11 of the First Schedule to
the Rules |
The Old Rules
prescribed Notices in Form TAT 8, but this has been replaced by the New Rules
which prescribes that same be done in Form TAT 11 |
|
13. |
Time Limit for determination of an
Appeal by the TAT |
Order XXI Rule 1
provides that appeals before the TAT shall be heard, concluded and decision
given within a period not exceeding six months from the date of commencement
of trial or within such a time as the TAT may determine. |
The New Rules have
prescribed that an appeal shall be concluded within 6months from the date
trial was commenced. This will save time as well as reduce the backlog of
cases that have been pending at the TAT. |
|
14. |
Review of TAT’s Decisions |
Order XXI Rule 6 provides that the
TAT may suo moto (on its own) or on the application of a
party review and correct, rescind or vary its decisions if it is satisfied
that-
a)
The decision contains an ambiguity, patent error or omission but only
to the extent of such ambiguity, error, or omission;
b)
The decision of the TAT was obtained by fraud.
This provision goes
further to state that parties to such decision shall have the opportunity to
be heard by the TAT
Order XXI Rule 7 provides that an
application for a review of the TAT’s decision shall be brought within 14
days from the date it was delivered. |
This will save time
and effort which would have ordinarily been used in an Appeal to the Federal
High Court. Where the conditions for a review have been proved by a Party,
such decision given by the TAT will be subject to a review. |
|
15. |
Settlement |
Order XXI Rule 9
provides that where Parties have indicated their desire to explore settlement
of their dispute, the TAT may adjourn the matter to enable the parties
explore such settlement. Parties are also required to report progress on the
settlement at such date as directed by the TAT.[8]
The Rules further
provide that upon parties reaching terms of settlement, both parties shall
sign same and file with the TAT, which shall adopt the terms of settlement as
its decision by consent of the parties.[9] |
The New Rules also
give parties an opportunity for settlement. Where parties have settled
outside the TAT, the TAT shall adopt the terms of settlement as its decision
in the matter. |
|
16. |
Costs |
Order XXII provides
that parties shall bear their own cost except where costs are incurred
improperly or without reasonable cause or are wasted by undue delay or by any
misconduct or default, then the TAT may award costs against any person
responsible. |
This is again
another point of inconsistency between the New Rules and the FIRSEA. The Act
provides that parties shall bear their own costs.[10]
We note that where a
subsidiary legislation is inconsistent with an Act, the provisions of such
subsidiary legislation shall be void to the extent of such inconsistency. |
|
17. |
Appeal to Federal High Court |
Order XXVII Rule 1
provides that a party dissatisfied with a decision of the TAT may appeal on
point of law to the Federal High Court by filing a Notice of Appeal at the TAT
within 30 days from the date such decision was given.[11]
The Secretary of the
TAT is mandated to transmit to the Chief Registrar of the Federal High Court
within 14 days, record of proceedings and all exhibits tendered at hearing
before the TAT.[12] |
We note that there
is an inconsistency between the provisions of the FIRSEA and the New Rules.
Paragraph 16 (3) of FIRSEA requires that notwithstanding an appeal at the Federal
High Court, tax shall be paid in accordance with the decision of the TAT
within one month. The New Rules are silent on this position as they do not
specify that tax should be paid before an appeal commences at the Federal
High Court. |
CONCLUSION
The New Rules contain several provisions which
are a reflection of the current realities and which will aid in a speedy
dispensation of justice. The adoption of an e-filing, e-service and e-hearing
process will go along way in assisting the TAT as well as parties in speedily
resolving their disputes.
However, there are provisions which are a cause
for concern – such as the provisions of Order III Rule 6 which requires an
aggrieved tax-payer who wishes to appeal an assessment from a tax authority to
make a deposit of 50% of the amount in dispute. This condition will seriously
hamper an appellant’s access to the TAT and also engender abuse of power or
corruption on the part of tax authorities, seeing that the doors of the TAT
have been semi-shut to tax-payers.
We also note the inconsistency between the
provisions of the New Rules and the FIRSEA in this regard, and restate that as
the FIRSEA has not provided for payment of any security deposit by Appellant
(except in Paragraph 15 (7), on which certain conditions have to be fulfilled
by the FIRS before an order for such payment is made), the Rules cannot on its
own prescribe the payment of a security deposit. Accordingly, we recommend that
this provision be amended to do away with the security deposit as condition for
an appeal as same is contradictory with the Act from which it emanates and from
which power is even granted to the Minister of Finance to make the Rules.
[1] Paragraph 1
of the Fifth Schedule to the FIRSEA
[2] Section 59
of the FIRSEA
[3] Paragraph
11 of the Fifth Schedule to the FIRSEA
[4] Paragraph
21 of the Fifth Schedule to the FIRSEA
[5] Order 1
Rule 2 of the Tax Appeal Tribunal (Procedure) Rules 2021
[6] Order III
Rule 1 of the TAT Rules 2010
[7] Paragraph
13 (1) and (2) of the Fifth Schedule to the FIRS Establishment Act
[8] Order XXI
Rule 9 (2) of the TAT Rules 2021
[9] Order XXI
Rule 9 (3) of the TAT Rules 2021
[10] Paragraph
22 of the Fifth Schedule to the FIRS Establishment Act
[11] Order XXVII
Rule 1 of the TAT Rules 2021
[12] Order XXVII
Rule 2 of the TAT Rules 2021
INTRODUCTION
The 5th Schedule to the FIRS
Establishment Act 2007 (FIRSEA) established the Tax Appeal Tribunal (TAT)
to preside over disputes between an aggrieved taxpayer and tax authorities in
Nigeria, giving it the right to exercise jurisdiction, powers and authority on
issues of taxation.[1] These tax authorities include
the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and any other body responsible
for the assessment and collection of taxes.[2]
The TAT is empowered to adjudicate on disputes
and controversies arising from tax laws including the Companies Income Tax Act
(CITA), Personal Income Tax Act (PITA), Petroleum Profits Tax Act, Capital
Gains Tax Act and any other law contained in or specified in the First Schedule
to the FIRSEA or other laws made or to be made from time to time by the
National Assembly.[3]
The FIRSEA further grants the Minister of
Finance the power to make rules prescribing the procedure to be followed in the
conduct of appeals before the TAT.[4]
It is further to this power that the TAT Rules 2021 (the New Rules) was brought
into force on the 10th of June, 2021, thereby revoking the TAT Rules
(2010).[5]
With the enactment of the New Rules, a number of changes have been introduced
to the procedure before the TAT. This article highlights the new procedures
brought into force by the New Rules.
INTRODUCTION
The 5th Schedule to the FIRS
Establishment Act 2007 (FIRSEA) established the Tax Appeal Tribunal (TAT)
to preside over disputes between an aggrieved taxpayer and tax authorities in
Nigeria, giving it the right to exercise jurisdiction, powers and authority on
issues of taxation.[1] These tax authorities include
the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and any other body responsible
for the assessment and collection of taxes.[2]
The TAT is empowered to adjudicate on disputes
and controversies arising from tax laws including the Companies Income Tax Act
(CITA), Personal Income Tax Act (PITA), Petroleum Profits Tax Act, Capital
Gains Tax Act and any other law contained in or specified in the First Schedule
to the FIRSEA or other laws made or to be made from time to time by the
National Assembly.[3]
The FIRSEA further grants the Minister of Finance the power to make rules prescribing the procedure to be followed in the conduct of appeals before the TAT.[4] It is further to this power that the TAT Rules 2021 (the New Rules) was brought into force on the 10th of June, 2021, thereby revoking the TAT Rules (2010).[5] With the enactment of the New Rules, a number of changes have been introduced to the procedure before the TAT. This article highlights the new procedures brought into force by the New Rules.
PROCEDURES INTRODUCED BY THE NEW RULES
PROCEDURES INTRODUCED BY THE NEW RULES
CONCLUSION
The New Rules contain several provisions which
are a reflection of the current realities and which will aid in a speedy
dispensation of justice. The adoption of an e-filing, e-service and e-hearing
process will go along way in assisting the TAT as well as parties in speedily
resolving their disputes.
However, there are provisions which are a cause
for concern – such as the provisions of Order III Rule 6 which requires an
aggrieved tax-payer who wishes to appeal an assessment from a tax authority to
make a deposit of 50% of the amount in dispute. This condition will seriously
hamper an appellant’s access to the TAT and also engender abuse of power or
corruption on the part of tax authorities, seeing that the doors of the TAT
have been semi-shut to tax-payers.
We also note the inconsistency between the
provisions of the New Rules and the FIRSEA in this regard, and restate that as
the FIRSEA has not provided for payment of any security deposit by Appellant
(except in Paragraph 15 (7), on which certain conditions have to be fulfilled
by the FIRS before an order for such payment is made), the Rules cannot on its
own prescribe the payment of a security deposit. Accordingly, we recommend that
this provision be amended to do away with the security deposit as condition for
an appeal as same is contradictory with the Act from which it emanates and from
which power is even granted to the Minister of Finance to make the Rules.
CONCLUSION
The New Rules contain several provisions which
are a reflection of the current realities and which will aid in a speedy
dispensation of justice. The adoption of an e-filing, e-service and e-hearing
process will go along way in assisting the TAT as well as parties in speedily
resolving their disputes.
However, there are provisions which are a cause
for concern – such as the provisions of Order III Rule 6 which requires an
aggrieved tax-payer who wishes to appeal an assessment from a tax authority to
make a deposit of 50% of the amount in dispute. This condition will seriously
hamper an appellant’s access to the TAT and also engender abuse of power or
corruption on the part of tax authorities, seeing that the doors of the TAT
have been semi-shut to tax-payers.
We also note the inconsistency between the
provisions of the New Rules and the FIRSEA in this regard, and restate that as
the FIRSEA has not provided for payment of any security deposit by Appellant
(except in Paragraph 15 (7), on which certain conditions have to be fulfilled
by the FIRS before an order for such payment is made), the Rules cannot on its
own prescribe the payment of a security deposit. Accordingly, we recommend that
this provision be amended to do away with the security deposit as condition for
an appeal as same is contradictory with the Act from which it emanates and from
which power is even granted to the Minister of Finance to make the Rules.
Share
For further information on the foregoing (none of which should be construed to be an actual legal advice), please contact:
