Marginal Fields Bid Rounds & Transfer of Shares under Incorporated SPVs

Introduction

In May 2020, the Nigerian Government announced the commencement of the Marginal Fields Bid Rounds through the issuance of bid guidelines. This bid rounds came to a climax on 31 May 2021 through the issuance of Award Letters to Awardees. In Q1 of 2021, the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) issued letters to potential Awardees by which they were informed of the amount of Signature Bonus required to be paid to the Nigerian Government. In addition, the DPR advised potential Awardees of the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPV) as the Operating Structure upon final award. The DPR through the Award Letters to Awardees on the said 31 May 2021, mandated Awardees to operate the relevant field through SPVs which shall be a Nigerian company jointly incorporated by the Awardees based on their respective equity interests in the field. The said Award Letters also mandated the Awardees to enter into three agreements which are: (i) an agreement to incorporate the SPV; (ii) SPV Shareholders’ Agreement; and (iii) SPV Operating Agreement.

The DPR also provided as appendices to the Award Letters, template of the above-mentioned agreements which is expected to serve as a guide for the Awardees. In this briefing note, we examine the provisions of the template Shareholders Agreement with regards to transfer of shares by the Awardee of the SPV for the purpose of raising capital vis-à-vis any conceivable legal hurdle contemplated by law and the template agreement.


Transfer of shares under Nigerian law and restriction of share transfer as contemplated under the template SPV Shareholders’ Agreement

Section 22(2) of the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020 provides that a private company may (i.e. without compulsion) restrict the transfer of its shares to a non-member where such share transfer has not been first offered to existing shareholders. Therefore, a company can decide not to put in place pre-emption rights with respect to transfer of its shares under the provisions of its Articles of Association.

Clause 3 of the template Shareholders’ Agreement however mandates a transferring shareholder of an SPV to first give notice to the DPR and the other shareholder(s) of its intention to dispose of its shares, identifying: the number of the shares to be disposed; the proposed purchase price per share; and the name of the proposed purchaser. It further mandates a selling shareholder to attach an exact copy of the offer received by such shareholder. 

The foregoing provisions makes it clear that pre-emption provisions/rights are applicable and compulsory for incorporated SPVs. While the pre-emption rights will strictly apply to parties to the SPV Shareholders, the rationale for the inclusion of the obligation to notify the DPR under the template Shareholders’ Agreement is not founded on pre-emption rights (as this will have no legal basis due to the fact that the DPR is not a shareholder in the SPV) but on regulatory oversight of the DPR with regards to transfer of interests in oil and gas assets. This notwithstanding, we find it hard to justify the need to include the DPR notification under the template Shareholders’ Agreement, bearing in mind that the Petroleum Act and the DPR Guidelines and Procedures for Obtaining Minister’s Consent to the Assignment of Interest in an Oil and Gas Asset already contemplates notification of the Minister/DPR in the event of a transfer of interest.

Another point to note is that the template SPV Shareholders’ Agreement seems to be incomplete as it does not provide for actions that will follow notification of intention to dispose shares by a selling shareholder to a non-selling shareholder. Typical shareholders’ agreement usually provides for actions to be taken upon notice of intention to sell. Such actions include: (i) time within which a non-selling shareholder is to make an offer; (ii) the terms of the acceptance of such offer; and (iii) consequence of failure to exercise pre-emption rights. 

What are the consequences of failure to include pre-emption provisions in the SPV Shareholders’ Agreement?

While parties are free to agree to terms of their contract, in addition to the fact that the template Shareholders’ Agreement can arguably be regarded as a guide, the curious question that come to fore is: “what is the potential impact of non-inclusion of pre-emption provisions in the SPV Shareholders’ Agreement?”

It is pertinent to mention that some parts of the Award Letter state that “failure to meet with any of the requirements… may lead to the cancellation of the entire interest of the parties in the award.”  On the basis of the foregoing, it is plausible that the DPR may decide to cancel an award in the event that the pre-emption provisions of the template Shareholders Agreement are not complied with. This may be an extreme position. Our view is premised on the fact that the Award Letter states that as a pre-condition to the negotiation of a Farmout Agreement, the submission of the particulars of the incorporated SPV alongside with various agreements including the SPV Shareholders’ Agreement needs to be done. Therefore, where preemption provisions are not included in the SPV Shareholders’ Agreement, there is the likelihood that the DPR may not approve negotiation of the Farmout Agreement by shareholders of the SPV with the relevant leaseholder and may demand that the relevant Shareholders’ Agreement be amended to include preemption provisions.

Conclusion

The SPV structure for owning/operating oil and gas assets in Nigeria appears to be the preference of the Nigerian government in recent times considering the moves a few years ago by government to set -up Incorporated Joint Ventures to replace Unincorporated Joint Ventures. While the template Shareholders’ Agreement provides some guide with regards to what is expected of shareholders of incorporated SPVs for marginal fields, there is need for the shareholders to properly negotiate a robust shareholders’ agreement to adequately cater for governance of the SPV amongst other things.

Share

LinkedIn
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
This publication is intended only for general discussion purposes only and should not be regarded as legal advice.
For further information on the foregoing, please contact:

Oyeyemi Oke

Partner

oyeyemi.oke@ao2law.com

Daniel Odupe

Associate

daniel.odupe@ao2law.com 

Ogonna Nzekwe

Associate

ogonna.nzekwe@ao2law.com

Ajoke Olawuyi

Associate

ajoke.olawuyi@ao2law.com 

Contact with the subject: “Marginal Fields Bid Rounds & Transfer of Shares under Incorporated SPVs.” 

More Articles

RECAPITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL BANKS: WHAT DOES THIS PORTEND FOR THE PENSION INDUSTRY?

RECAPITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL BANKS: WHAT DOES THIS PORTEND FOR THE PENSION INDUSTRY?

Nigeria’s economic headwinds over the years have culminated in hyperinflation, macroeconomic variability, and instability in the exchange rate. As part of the approaches to tackle the economic instability bedevilling the country and bolster the country’s economy to be more resilient, solvent and in tune with the aspirations of the Federal Government of Nigeria , the Central Bank of Nigeria (“CBN”) issued a circular mandating commercial, merchant, and non-interest banks to shore up their capital base. This recapitalization exercise is backed by Section 9 of the Banks and Other Financial Institutions Act, 2020 (“BOFIA”) which empowers the apex bank to, from time to time determine the minimum paid-up share capital requirement of each category of licensed banks operating in Nigeria.

DIGITAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION: NAVIGATING LEGAL CHALLENGES IN ONLINE TRANSACTIONS

The development of Internet and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has revolutionised the world and brought with them the emergence of online commerce. Trades are now concluded on the Internet between parties from different parts of the world. Online transactions have reshaped the foundations of trade and have brought many advantages to many individuals and corporate entities. More goods and services are being bought and sold online on a daily basis. In fact, some goods and services are bought and sold virtually online without any physical or tangible equivalent. Interestingly, Nigerian Courts are increasingly adopting digital tools, especially in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic to resolve commercial disputes. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures such as arbitration and mediation are also being digitized.

Aligning ESG Practices in the Nigerian Oil and Gas Sector with Climate Change and Nigeria’s Net-Zero Goal by 2060

Nigeria’s oil and gas sector evolved over the decades. The sector has moved from an era where little or no effort was put towards addressing the negative impacts occasioned by oil exploration and other incendiary activities, the failure by the Federal Government (FG) to sign the Petroleum Industry Bill into Law and a plethora of socially related malaise that have affected the host communities; their source of livelihood and their living conditions to one where a robust Legislative framework coupled with Regulations have been put in place to make it align with global best practices.