REGULATING ANTI-COMPETITION PRACTICES IN NIGERIA: A TALE OF THE PAST, PRESENT + FUTURE

Introduction

Nigerian law expressly recognises, as anti-competition practices or conducts, each of the concepts or practices of: Restraint of Trade, Price Fixing, Price Discrimination, Collusion, Conspiracy, Cartel, Bid Rigging, Abuse of Dominant Market Position, Mergers or Acquisitions which lessen Competition, Monopolies et.al. In this brief, we shall take a cursory yet practical look at each of these practices, and more importantly, examine the institutions that have been created to curtail them. We shall also express commentaries on the future of anti-competition regulation in Nigeria.

 

Anti-Competition Practices under Nigerian Law

Anti-Competition practices under Nigerian law are primarily regulated by the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2018 (the Act). The Act establishes the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (the Commission) and the Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal (the Tribunal). More importantly, the Act delimits and prohibits certain business practices, which are considered anti-competitive, among undertakings. The Act employs the use of the expression ‘undertakings’, which expression refers to any or all of companies, firms, and individuals carrying on business, or any group or association of them. For ease of language, we shall, going forward, substitute ‘undertakings’ with ‘Business(es)’.

 

Now, let us look at some of the practices that the Act considers anti-competitive; all of which it limits or prohibits.

 

Restrictive Agreements

These are decisions or agreements among Businesses which have the actual or likely effect of preventing or distorting competition either directly or indirectly. Restrictive Agreements cover a very board spectrum of collusive business practices which are common amongst market cartels. Examples of such include agreements among Businesses which tend to:

  • fix the purchase or selling price of the goods or services provided by the Businesses;
  • divide markets by allocating customers, suppliers, territories or specific types of goods or services among the Businesses
  • limit or control production or distribution of good or services, technical development or investment by setting quotas thereby causing artificial inflations;
  • controlling demand and supply;
  • engaging in collusive tendering; and
  • et al.

Except such agreements are authorized by the Commission or qualify under the exempted professional and employee associations or labour etc., such agreements or clauses are prohibited, void and of no legal effect.  Additionally, these practices constitute specific criminal offences, to wit; Price Fixing, Conspiracy and Bid-rigging; all of which we shall briefly touch shortly.

 

Complete this form to download the entire article

For further information on the foregoing (none of which should be construed to be an actual legal advice) please contact:

Bidemi Olumide
Managing Partner
bidemi.olumide@ao2law.com

Oluseun Olayiwola
Associate
oluseun.olayiwola@ao2law-intern.com

Share

More Articles

A DECADE POST THE PENSION REFORM ACT 2014: ANY NEED FOR CHANGE?

Nigeria’s pension system has undergone significant transformations since its inception in 1951. Initially plagued with malpractices, budgetary issues, weak administration, and a lack of accountability, the system has evolved into a defined contribution scheme for both public and private sector employers and employees. In 2004, the Federal Government enacted the Pension Reform Act 2004 (“PRA 2004”), instituting the Defined Contributory Pension Scheme (“CPS”) and establishing the National Pension Commission (the “Commission”) as the regulatory authority.

IMPACT OF THE NEW PRICING OF NATURAL GAS FOR THE NIGERIAN DOMESTIC GAS MARKET

Nigeria is said to have 206.53 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of untapped proven gas reserves with an estimated recoverable gas reserve of 139.4 tcf. Despite the abundance of gas reserves, the production and development of gas have not been optimally harnessed. This is largely attributable to the capital-intensive nature of gas production. However, the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) has continued to formulate policies , enact laws and make regulations that will enhance the development and utilization of Natural Gas and availability of Natural Gas for the domestic market.

AN ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICACY OF MINORITY PROTECTION UNDER NIGERIAN COMPANY LAW

The protection of the minority shareholders within the domain of corporate activity constitutes one of the most difficult problems facing modern company law. It is not unusual to find majority shareholders running a company in an illegal or oppressive mode irrespective of provisions of the laws regulating the operation of companies in Nigeria or managing the company in an oppressive manner detrimental to the rights of the minority shareholders.