REGULATING ANTI-COMPETITION PRACTICES IN NIGERIA: A TALE OF THE PAST, PRESENT + FUTURE

Introduction

Nigerian law expressly recognises, as anti-competition practices or conducts, each of the concepts or practices of: Restraint of Trade, Price Fixing, Price Discrimination, Collusion, Conspiracy, Cartel, Bid Rigging, Abuse of Dominant Market Position, Mergers or Acquisitions which lessen Competition, Monopolies et.al. In this brief, we shall take a cursory yet practical look at each of these practices, and more importantly, examine the institutions that have been created to curtail them. We shall also express commentaries on the future of anti-competition regulation in Nigeria.

 

Anti-Competition Practices under Nigerian Law

Anti-Competition practices under Nigerian law are primarily regulated by the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2018 (the Act). The Act establishes the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (the Commission) and the Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal (the Tribunal). More importantly, the Act delimits and prohibits certain business practices, which are considered anti-competitive, among undertakings. The Act employs the use of the expression ‘undertakings’, which expression refers to any or all of companies, firms, and individuals carrying on business, or any group or association of them. For ease of language, we shall, going forward, substitute ‘undertakings’ with ‘Business(es)’.

 

Now, let us look at some of the practices that the Act considers anti-competitive; all of which it limits or prohibits.

 

Restrictive Agreements

These are decisions or agreements among Businesses which have the actual or likely effect of preventing or distorting competition either directly or indirectly. Restrictive Agreements cover a very board spectrum of collusive business practices which are common amongst market cartels. Examples of such include agreements among Businesses which tend to:

  • fix the purchase or selling price of the goods or services provided by the Businesses;
  • divide markets by allocating customers, suppliers, territories or specific types of goods or services among the Businesses
  • limit or control production or distribution of good or services, technical development or investment by setting quotas thereby causing artificial inflations;
  • controlling demand and supply;
  • engaging in collusive tendering; and
  • et al.

Except such agreements are authorized by the Commission or qualify under the exempted professional and employee associations or labour etc., such agreements or clauses are prohibited, void and of no legal effect.  Additionally, these practices constitute specific criminal offences, to wit; Price Fixing, Conspiracy and Bid-rigging; all of which we shall briefly touch shortly.

 

Complete this form to download the entire article

For further information on the foregoing (none of which should be construed to be an actual legal advice) please contact:

Bidemi Olumide
Managing Partner
bidemi.olumide@ao2law.com

Oluseun Olayiwola
Associate
oluseun.olayiwola@ao2law-intern.com

Share

More Articles

A REVIEW OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S PROPOSED RULES ON THE ISSUANCE AND ALLOTMENT OF DEBT SECURITIES BY PRIVATE COMPANIES

Under previous Nigerian law, only public companies, statutory bodies, and banks could publicly offer or trade securities, while private companies were restricted. The 2023 Business Facilitation Act amended section 67(1) of the Investments and Securities Act, allowing private companies to issue securities publicly. The Securities and Exchange Commission has now issued draft rules for this new regulation. This article highlights key changes these rules introduce.

ASSESSING THE SHIFT IN PAYMENT STRUCTURES IN NIGERIA’S REAL ESTATE SECTOR: BENEFITS, CHALLENGES, AND IMPLICATIONS

During his book launch in February 2024, the former Minister of Works and Housing, Mr. Babatunde Raji Fashola, advocated for the adoption of monthly rental charge in the Nigerian Real Estate Industry. His argument was premised on the ground that yearly rental payment in a country like Nigeria can be overwhelming for the low-income earners and suggested that other states should be inspired by the Tenancy Law of Lagos State 2011, which criminalizes the collection of rent over one year in advance from any tenant .